Re: Does this 'and' construct make sense?

[Urs Liska]

Am 06.03.2015 11:34, schrieb Richard Shann:
> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> > Am 06.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Richard Shann:
> > > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 08:25 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> > > > I find
> > > >
> > > > %% switch on debugging.
> > > > #(if (and #t (defined? 'set-debug-cell-accesses!))
> > > >      (set-debug-cell-accesses! 5000))
> > > >
> > > > (found in init.ly)
> > > >
> > > > strange.
> > > > Wouldn't it be better ot simply remove the 'and' construct?
> > > > #t evaluates to #t always, isn't it?
> > >
> > > ...
> > OK, I think this means that could be removed.
> certainly!
>
> Richard

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4313

--
Urs Liska
address@hidden