Re: placement of dot after notehead

[MING TSANG]

Simon,

Wow! Its perfect. Thank you very much.

Immanuel,

Ming.

On Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:48 PM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:

Am 26.03.2015 um 19:57 schrieb MING TSANG:

Hi, Simon:

Thank you, but I did not see the attachment.

That’s probably because I forgot to attach it…
Here you go :-)

Immanuel,

Ming

On Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:30 PM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:

Hello Ming,

here’s the best I could come up with. I remember that in hand-engraved scores, this is resolved by shifting the two notes further apart and placing the dots close to each one, which I now mimicked, albeit very poorly: the dot placement looks very odd now. Perhaps you’ll want to fiddle with extra-offset more, adjusting also the Y value (which I didn’t; you may also make the music function take it as another argument – see the Extending Manual on explanations), so it will look good.

HTH, Simon

Am 26.03.2015 um 16:26 schrieb MING TSANG:

Adnrew,

Sorry, I choose the wrong word here.  

I was hoping that the dot will be displayed closer to the notehead. e.g. 1st bar of bass staff, the dot of quarter note be displayed closer to quarter note , now it line up with the half note.  This is more evident on bar3.

Immanuel,

Ming

On Thursday, March 26, 2015 9:13 AM, Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> wrote:

I am not convinced the dots look awful. It’s perfectly legible to me - just highly dotted notation. What do you mean by awful, exactly?

Andrew

On 26 March 2015 at 10:29:06, MING TSANG (address@hidden) wrote:

Lilyponders:

how to solve the dots after notehead and tie collides. 

1.  tie collide with notehead -- treble staff sample

2.  place of dots look awful and not clear - refer to bass staff

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user