|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Creating LilyPond Object Models |
Date: | Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:22:51 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
Am 23.04.2015 um 02:05 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Harm,Speaking as a user, I always thought about a "Voice" like a _musician_, never had problems with that thinking.But (he says, taking on the role of the average newbie user) a pianist is a musician. So why can’t I write all of the piano music I need that musician to play in a single Voice? ;) Ultimately, if you understand a MIDI “voice”, then you understand a Lilypond “Voice”. If you don’t, I’m not sure there’s a real-world analogy that can be drawn clearly.
Hm, I'm not so sure about that. As a pianist I do have a notion of "voice" that's quite close to LilyPond's.On the piano I can play/think in voices or not. If I don't play voiced (i.e. polyphonic) music a usually can translate that to chords in LilyPond. And with all these inconsistencies in piano writing that are so hard to translate to LilyPond I have already grasped before that this is because of the piano's "abuse" of voices. I still often curse LilyPond that it can't mimick this abuse (for example by allowing slurs to go from one voice to another), but it's not an issue with the *concept* of "Voice".
Urs
Cheers, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: address@hidden _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |