lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Do we really offer the future?


From: Simon Albrecht
Subject: Re: Do we really offer the future?
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 18:30:53 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

Am 26.04.2015 um 18:10 schrieb Michael Hendry:

On 26 Apr 2015, at 15:16, H. S. Teoh <address@hidden> wrote:

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 06:15:13AM +0000, Keith OHara wrote:
Michael Hendry <hendry.michael <at> gmail.com> writes:

I routinely put the bar checks at the _beginnings_ of the bars,
thus...

| a4 b c d
| a8 b c d e f g a
| a16 b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b


That works very nicely. 

When I had a measure that took more than one line of input, I used to
try to make that clear by indenting the continuation line a bit
further, but that was lost on any auto-indenting.  Now I can just
 | \acciaccatura d,8 <b, g>4.(\ff )b8 a4.( )g8
 | a4.( )c8 b4.( )a8
 | \acciaccatura ais8 b8[-.\fz ]b-. b[-.\fz ]b-.
 b[-.\fz ]b-. \acciaccatura ais8 b[-.\fz ]b-.
 | <c, d b>8 r <c, c a>8\downbow r \acciaccatura d, <b, g>2
and I can easily find my measures.
[...]

Am I the only one who puts bar checks at *both* the beginning and end of
a bar?

| a4 b c d |
| e f g a |

Probably <G>.

Why would you want to check each bar twice?
These bar checks are mostly for humans to ease reading of the code, not for machine interpreting.

Yours, Simon

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]