[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a proper whiteout function
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: a proper whiteout function |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2015 18:54:17 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 |
On 5/18/15 12:49 PM, "Carl Sorensen" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>At any rate, there should probably be a user-specifiable way to change all
>three values that govern the performance, whether by context properties or
>by arguments.
As I think about it some more, perhaps the most logically-consistent set
of three properties is:
offset -- How big is the white outline in staff-spaces
radial-increments -- how many copies of the white stencil do we make on
our way out to offset
angle-increments -- how many copies of the white stencil do we make
between 0 and 2*pi
And should we have a color argument, as well? Could we want to make the
outline some color other than white?
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Paul Morris, 2015/05/17
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Carl Sorensen, 2015/05/17
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Paul Morris, 2015/05/18
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Carl Sorensen, 2015/05/18
- Re: a proper whiteout function,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Paul Morris, 2015/05/19
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Janek Warchoł, 2015/05/20
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Carl Sorensen, 2015/05/20
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Janek Warchoł, 2015/05/20
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Paul Morris, 2015/05/24
Re: a proper whiteout function, Wilbert Berendsen, 2015/05/18
Re: a proper whiteout function, Carl Sorensen, 2015/05/18