lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gallery of Interesting Music Notation


From: Simon Albrecht
Subject: Re: Gallery of Interesting Music Notation
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 02:58:40 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0

Am 31.08.2015 um 21:33 schrieb Steve Lacy:
I found this fascinating:

http://homes.soic.indiana.edu/donbyrd/InterestingMusicNotation.html

I wonder if anyone here (or elsewhere) has tried to engrave some of these, even as musical fragments? I'm sure it would be an eye-opening process. :)

Perhaps the second Chopin example (op. 15 no. 2, m. 8/9) is the most challenging one. I disagree with the analysis given by Mr. Bird, although I can’t even quite follow his reasoning why we should play some notes (and which?) right-to-left. I would interpret this as a kind of arpeggio (an interpretation also displayed in the Klindworth/Scharwenka and Scholtz editions – although I’d never go the route of eliminating the subtle difference Chopin made in not actually writing a normal arpeggio). An interesting question is the synchronisation with the left hand: leaving aside these with arpeggio notation, all of the editions align the down-stemmed voice with the bass note on the upbeat; for the downbeat this is the case in the Kullak/Parsons, Bargiel and Cortot editions, whereas Mikuli and Joseffy align the topmost note with the bass. Interestingly, Kullak/Parsons distinctly have the second bass note in bar 9 not aligned with the third semiquaver of the highest voice either, but somewhat earlier. There it would be really interesting to look into the autograph or first editions – maybe I’ll check some critical editions (the above is only what could be found on IMSLP, and that’s not quite satisfactory, especially with the complex situation often seen with Chopin).

Find attached an essay at coding this, along with two ways of standardising this notation. I’m not fully content yet – especially the beams should get a grace-like look, but I couldn’t figure out how to do that: one may easily reduce the thickness and move it down, but the gap between the beams seems to be hard-coded :-(.

Best regards,
Simon

Attachment: chopin-grace-sync.ly
Description: Text Data

Attachment: chopin-grace-sync.png
Description: PNG image


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]