Reading my way through Behind Bars by Elaine Gould, I'm trying to replicate some of the examples in LilyPond. One of them contains a tie over a system break:\version "2.18.2"
\relative c'' {
r2. fis,4~ | \break
fis8 a16 fis r8 r2 \bar "|."
}
LP puts a sharp in front of the first f# in measure 2 as well as the second one. According to Gould repeating an accidental twice in a bar in close succession is redundant (and I think I agree with her). To hide the second sharp, I've put \once \override Accidental #'transparent = ##t in front of it. Is this the preferred way of doing hiding that sharp?
I don't consider this a bug per se, but maybe LP can programmed to avoid repeating accidentals in close succession in upcoming versions?
Sven