[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests
From: |
Gilberto Agostinho |
Subject: |
Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:37:29 -0700 (MST) |
David Wright wrote
> I think you're making the assumption that R1*4 is just a textual
> shorthand for R1 R1 R1 R1 but it isn't. R1*4 is a single "chunk".
Oh, I see. So the chunk already happened before the different \partcombine
option is selected. Well, this makes combining parts slightly more annoying
in cases like the one I posted above since one has to manually find the
point to break the chunk of R1, but I do understand it isn't a bug.
Thanks for your reply and take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-and-multi-measure-rests-tp182372p182374.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- partcombine and multi-measure rests, Gilberto Agostinho, 2015/10/14
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, David Wright, 2015/10/14
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests,
Gilberto Agostinho <=
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, Gilberto Agostinho, 2015/10/15
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, Simon Albrecht, 2015/10/14
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, Simon Albrecht, 2015/10/15
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, Gilberto Agostinho, 2015/10/14
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, David Wright, 2015/10/22
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, David Kastrup, 2015/10/23
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, Gilberto Agostinho, 2015/10/17
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, Phil Holmes, 2015/10/17
- Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests, Gilberto Agostinho, 2015/10/17