[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:25:34 +0200 |
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:59:42 -0500
David Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
> A very common workflow but IMO a very poor one. If you have problems
> printing, where do you start looking for the cause? (for example,
> artifacts like those in the right side of your lpev.png).
>
> I only ever print from applications to a file. Then I print the file.
How do you print? cat > /dev/printer? lpr? A viewer? Except for the first,
they all involve 'hidden' software between the physical PostScript file and
the physical printout.
> Having eventually downloaded that PNG (squirrel.nl disappeared from
> google's nameservers for a while) I wondered whether the images are
> rescans of printouts through glass, or generated through computation.
Two rescans at high density, glued together in GIMP.
-- Johan
- [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, flup2, 2015/10/12
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, Jonathan Webster, 2015/10/12
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, Andrew Bernard, 2015/10/12
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, Johan Vromans, 2015/10/15
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, Andrew Bernard, 2015/10/13
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, Johan Vromans, 2015/10/13
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, David Wright, 2015/10/19
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript,
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, David Wright, 2015/10/19
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, Johan Vromans, 2015/10/20
- Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript, Wols Lists, 2015/10/13