[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gregorian notation - augmentum problem
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Gregorian notation - augmentum problem |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:30:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
Hi Phil,
> I think there are two issues here: one is LilyPond's handling of bar
> lines in what is intended to be unmetered music, and the other is your
> use of the augmentum. Taking the second first, the way you're using it
> is putting an extra half beat in the music, so we effectively try to fit
> 4.5 beats into a 4 beat bar. This messes up the timing of every
> following bar, so it's really not a good thing.
I guessed that – but what can I do if I need the \augmentum ? Add spacer
rests to fill up the bar? Or is this all cured by removing the
Default_bar_line_engraver as you showed me below?
> I've taken some settings I use for Mensural music, and using them all
> fixes your problem with the rest of the layout. You may like to
> experiment to see if they're all necessary.
Thanks for your settings. I comment them inline:
> ragged-last = ##f % the piece I copy prefers ##t
> indent = 0.0 % I want the indent
> timing = ##t % does it change anything?
> barAlways = ##f % does it change anything?
> \context {
> \Score
> \override SpacingSpanner #'spacing-increment = #0 % this is helpful (1)
> \override SpacingSpanner #'base-shortest-duration = #(ly:make-moment 1 2)
> \remove "Default_bar_line_engraver" % I was searching for that name (2)
> }
(1) Whatever this Spacing spanner change does, it looks much better
(2) I tried to remove the bar line engraver but all I found was the
Bar_engraver which obviously did not have the desired effect.
Perhaps you can also have a look at my more detailed description, I will
send to Michael and David.
Thanks for your help,
Joram
Re: Gregorian notation - augmentum problem, Phil Holmes, 2015/10/29
- Re: Gregorian notation - augmentum problem,
Noeck <=