[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams"
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams" |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:20:45 -0500 |
Hi David,
> curved beams are an area where there's a lot to lose and little to gain.
It would be nearly impossible to put the point more succinctly than that.
Thanks,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", (continued)
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", David Kastrup, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", mskala, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", mskala, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Andrew Bernard, 2015/12/18
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", David Kastrup, 2015/12/18
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/18
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Andrew Bernard, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams",
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Rounded beams, Andrew Bernard, 2015/12/17
- Re: Rounded beams, Urs Liska, 2015/12/17
- Re: Rounded beams, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/17
- Re: Rounded beams, Urs Liska, 2015/12/17
- Re: Rounded beams, Andrew Bernard, 2015/12/17
- Re: Rounded beams, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/17
- Re: Rounded beams, David Kastrup, 2015/12/18