On Dec 20, 2015, at 6:16 PM, address@hidden wrote:
Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
address@hidden
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden
You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re:big (?) challenge: multi-segment / multi-angle
OttavaBracket (Kieren MacMillan)
2. Re:saxophon multiphonic, how to (Klaus Blum)
3. Re:Telemann's "Strich" (Andrew Bernard)
4. Re:big (?) challenge: multi-segment / multi-angle
OttavaBracket (Thomas Morley)
5. Re:Telemann's "Strich" (Andrew Bernard)
6. Re:big (?) challenge: multi-segment / multi-angle
OttavaBracket (Kieren MacMillan)
7. Re:Telemann's "Strich" (Simon Albrecht)
8. pretty-print and localAlterations (Simon Albrecht)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 17:50:55 -0500
From: Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>
To: Thomas Morley <address@hidden>
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: big (?) challenge: multi-segment / multi-angle
OttavaBracket
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Harm,
you don't provide any code ;)
Well, to be honest, I didn?t expect an actual [honest-to-goodness Lilypond
code] fix: I thought the answer would either be ?look at X snippet? or ?can?t
be done? or ?this is issue Y?, or in the very best case scenario ?one *could*
create a ?kneed-spanner? thingee, if one wanted to??
I sometimes forget there are [amazing] people like you on this list, who might
actually take it upon themselves to solve such a gargantuan problem as a first
response. =\
In the future, I?ll make it more explicit when I?m only looking [at first] for
a quick ?possible/impossible? answer.
I really dislike inline-images.
Hmmm? I think that?s a problem with my mail application; I?ll look into it, and
try to use only outline (?) attachments from now on.
Below some code, which hopefully does what you want
HOLY M OLY! This is fabulous.
1. Yes, it appears (at least, from your snippet) to do exactly what I want; I will
test it ?in production", and report back ASAP.
2. Let me know (off-line, if desired) what a reasonable fee is for your work;
I?ll definitely pay you something.
Every layout-change will likely result in the need of readjusting?
That?s fine by me, at least in the short term: I can do all of the tweaking in
the edition-engraver (post-layout).
It would be far simpler if one could add an option to make-path-stencil to draw
dashed lines.
But I found no way to do so. Thus I defined `make-dashed-line-stencil' and
`make-connected-dashed-line-stencil' first.
With `kneed-line' I try to give you a little easier to use code at hand, but
I'm really not convinced.
Well, if anyone else finds this idea worth pursuing/sponsoring, perhaps we can
crowd-source your code into an awesome patch!?
Thanks again!
I?ll report back soon.
Cheers,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
? website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
? email: address@hidden
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:03:15 -0700 (MST)
From: Klaus Blum <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: saxophon multiphonic, how to
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Stefan,
according to a saxophone tutor written by Jean-Marie Londeix, the three keys
for the left palm are called C1, C2 and C4:
% ------------------------------------------------------
\markup \line {
\center-column {
C1
" "
\scale #'(-1 . 1) \woodwind-diagram
#'saxophone
#'(
(cc . ())
(lh . (d))
(rh . ())
)
}
\hspace #4
\center-column {
C2
" "
\scale #'(-1 . 1) \woodwind-diagram
#'saxophone
#'(
(cc . ())
(lh . (ees))
(rh . ())
)
}
\hspace #4
\center-column {
C4
" "
\scale #'(-1 . 1) \woodwind-diagram
#'saxophone
#'(
(cc . ())
(lh . (f))
(rh . ())
)
}
}
% ------------------------------------------------------
As you might see, I've flipped the charts with \scale #'(-1 . 1), so they
show the fingerings from the player's perspective. That's what I learned in
my clarinet and saxophone lessons.
HTH,
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/saxophon-multiphonic-how-to-tp184913p184925.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:16:56 +1100
From: Andrew Bernard <address@hidden>
To: Robert Blackstone <address@hidden>,
<address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Telemann's "Strich"
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Interesting!
I have a generalised arrow drawing function that draws arrows of any length in
any rotational position, done in Scheme. If I removed the arrowhead, do you
think that would be useful? My arrows are not tapered lines, but of uniform
thickness.
Amusingly, recently we wanted curved beams. Now we want straight slurs!
Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/attachments/20151221/576c14ec/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:25:18 +0100
From: Thomas Morley <address@hidden>
To: Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: big (?) challenge: multi-segment / multi-angle
OttavaBracket
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
2015-12-20 23:50 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>:
HOLY MOLY! This is fabulous.
Glad you like it.
1. Yes, it appears (at least, from your snippet) to do exactly what I want; I will
test it ?in production", and report back ASAP.
Though, I'm afraid you will surely notice the disadvantages soon.
2. Let me know (off-line, if desired) what a reasonable fee is for your work;
I?ll definitely pay you something.
This code isn't ready to be implemented into the source, maybe (and
its a big maybe) into LSR.
It's an extended variation of some code I made for a user in the
german forum some time ago and based on Mike Solomon's fix for
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3230/
No need for any payment to me.
You may want to donate something to David K. who really needs it.
Without his fabulous work I would be far less effective helping on the
user-list. His work is not always directly noticeable/user-accessible,
but every time I look up how codings were done in past lily-versions I
see again how good LilyPond developed, most basic work was David's!
Speaking only for me, bounties doesn't attract me.
An interesting problem, good presented (sic) and I'm on it.
Well, if I've the time for it...
Every layout-change will likely result in the need of readjusting?
That?s fine by me, at least in the short term: I can do all of the tweaking in
the edition-engraver (post-layout).
I didn't use the edition-engraver so far, can't say if it will work
It would be far simpler if one could add an option to make-path-stencil to draw
dashed lines.
But I found no way to do so. Thus I defined `make-dashed-line-stencil' and
`make-connected-dashed-line-stencil' first.
With `kneed-line' I try to give you a little easier to use code at hand, but
I'm really not convinced.
Well, if anyone else finds this idea worth pursuing/sponsoring, perhaps we can
crowd-source your code into an awesome patch!?
I'm not sure a patch will be possible, at least with _this_ approach.
But maybe with some other, lemme think about it ...
Thanks again!
I?ll report back soon.
Cheers,
Kieren.
Cheers,
Harm
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:34:37 +1100
From: Andrew Bernard <address@hidden>
To: Robert Blackstone <address@hidden>,
<address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Telemann's "Strich"
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Of course I just realised you don?t need the full generality of my arrow
function. You can just use the draw-line function. It?s in the section ?Graphic
notation inside markup?.
Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/attachments/20151221/fa27ebd9/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 19:02:44 -0500
From: Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>
To: Thomas Morley <address@hidden>
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: big (?) challenge: multi-segment / multi-angle
OttavaBracket
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Harm,
Though, I'm afraid you will surely notice the disadvantages soon.
Well, maybe I already have? but it?s still impressive. =)
You may want to donate something to David K. who really needs it.
There seems to be a problem with PayPal at the moment; as soon as it clears up,
I will send DK a payment.
More anon,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
? website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
? email: address@hidden
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:10:25 +0100
From: Simon Albrecht <address@hidden>
To: Robert Blackstone <address@hidden>,
address@hidden
Subject: Re: Telemann's "Strich"
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On 20.12.2015 12:44, Robert Blackstone wrote:
Dear list,
I?m working on a bilingual edition of Telemann?s Singe-, Spiel- und
General-Ba?-?bungen, a very nice little tutorial consisting almost
entirely of songs with a figured bass line and a written-out realization.
In the bass lines Telemann sometimes adds short straight lines
parallel with the note heads, a sort of straight slur, indicating that
the right hand should not play chords except on he first on these
?slurred? notes. See the attached Telemann's_Strich.png
I definitely agree with Richard?s interpretation that these are figured
bass extenders. The quote in your first example makes it really obvious:
?Der Strich bedeutet, dass die rechte Hand daselbst ruhe? ? ?The line
means that the right hand should rest there.?
For a reengraving it?s definitely better to have them outside the staff,
together with the actual figures. One shouldn?t try sticking too closely
to the appearance of 18th century writing/engraving.
Yours, Simon
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:16:02 +0100
From: Simon Albrecht <address@hidden>
To: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Subject: pretty-print and localAlterations
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hello,
if I compile the following code:
%%%%%%%%
\version "2.19.32"
#(use-modules (ice-9 pretty-print))
printKeysig =
\applyContext #(lambda (context)
(format #t "~a" (pretty-print (ly:context-property context
'localAlterations))))
\relative {
es'4 \printKeysig e'
}
%%%%%%%%
I get a spurious #<unspecified> in the console output, on its own line.
Of course, it?s not an actual problem, but I?d still be curious where it
comes from.
Yours, Simon
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
End of lilypond-user Digest, Vol 157, Issue 92
**********************************************