[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cross-staff phrase marks
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Cross-staff phrase marks |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:47:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.0.151221 |
On 2/17/16 10:31 AM, "Kieren MacMillan" <address@hidden>
wrote:
>Hi Simon,
>
>>> chaining, [composite] slurs
>> There¹s no such thing, and it sounds like a nightmare ;-)
>
>Oh, I agree it would be a nightmareŠ
>
>But ³there¹s no such thing² just isn¹t true: the snippet below shows how
>to get two separate slurs covering the same set of notes, and from there,
>making a ³composite slur² would be just a matter of [lots and lots of
>painful, trial-and-error, and almost certainly fragile] shaping work.
Slurs are *not* bezier curves; they are bezier sandwiches (meaning they
have an upper and lower bezier curve, with common endpoints. We would
need to define a composite bezier sandwich in order to develop proper
composite curves.
Of course, that could be done.
Carl
- Cross-staff phrase marks, Hilary Snaden, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, David Nalesnik, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/17