[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond error behaviour
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond error behaviour |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:29:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
Hi Sharon,
Thomas Morley explained it to me rather well in another branch of this
thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg111048.html
The non-fatal errors are re-raised as a fatal error after the pdf is
produced just to alert the user in the end that there were errors. And I
think that is what confuses most people here. The error was non-fatal
but still after everything is done, an additional fatal error is raised
to draw attention to previous non-fatal errors.
Cheers,
Joram
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Sharon Rosner, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, mskala, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, David Wright, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, mskala, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, David Kastrup, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, mskala, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Sharon Rosner, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Anthonys Lists, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Sharon Rosner, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Sharon Rosner, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour,
Noeck <=
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, mskala, 2016/04/19
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Thomas Morley, 2016/04/19
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, mskala, 2016/04/19
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, David Kastrup, 2016/04/19
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Sharon Rosner, 2016/04/19
Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Andrew Bernard, 2016/04/17
Re:Lilypond error behaviour, Peter Gentry, 2016/04/17
Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Johannes Waldmann, 2016/04/18
Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Tim Reeves, 2016/04/19