[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0
From: |
Andrew Bernard |
Subject: |
Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0 |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2016 19:35:32 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.15.1.160411 |
Pardon my ignorance but why do you want to support a common subset? For what
purpose? The whole point of Python 3 is that it breaks 2 in order to become a
superior and more consistent langauge. It’s been out since 2008, an eternity in
IT terms. Please help me understand.
Andrew
On 23/04/2016, 6:33 PM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Well, unless there are really compelling reasons otherwise, sticking
>with a common subset (namely making it work with Python 3 while keeping
>it working with Python 2) would seem like the sanest option.
- Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0,
Andrew Bernard <=
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, David Kastrup, 2016/04/23
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, Andrew Bernard, 2016/04/23
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, David Kastrup, 2016/04/23
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, Federico Bruni, 2016/04/23
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, David Kastrup, 2016/04/23
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, Carlo Stemberger, 2016/04/23
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, Noeck, 2016/04/23
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, Martin Tarenskeen, 2016/04/23
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, David Kastrup, 2016/04/24
- Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0, Noeck, 2016/04/24