[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Replying to posts
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: Replying to posts |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:43:16 +0200 |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:30:25 +0200
Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think this needs some clarification:
>
> Inserting *code* examples within the text is usually very good for
> communication. I think the suggested ban on inline examples referred to
> *images*
Too often I encounter code samples in mail bodies that have been mangled by
mailers. Sending sources as attachment is (usually) fail safe.
Of course, one can cite parts of the code samples in the message to clarify
the problems.
-- Johan
- Re: Replying to posts, (continued)
- Re: Replying to posts, Andrew Bernard, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, mskala, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, mskala, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Johan Vromans, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Federico Bruni, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Urs Liska, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts,
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: Replying to posts, Alexander Kobel, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Malte Meyn, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Urs Liska, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Andrew Bernard, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Chris Yate, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Johan Vromans, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Alberto Simões, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Chris Yate, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Federico Bruni, 2016/04/29
- Re: Replying to posts, Federico Bruni, 2016/04/29