[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gould &c. question
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Gould &c. question |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:33:14 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.5.160527 |
On 7/11/16 7:54 AM, "Simon Albrecht" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>what do the authorities say on beaming something like this:
>
>%%%%%%%%%%
>\version "2.19.45"
>{
> \time 2/2
> \repeat unfold 4 { \tuplet 6/4 { c16 e g c' g e } }
>}
>%%%%%%%%%%
>
>Currently, it¹s beamed by half-measure, which I think impairs
>legibility, so I introduced a patch changing this to beaming by quarter
>note value (issue 4919).
The authorities say to beam by the beat, which is the half measure. I
think that's why the default is what it is.
Thanks,
Carl