Re: Accidental in brackets

[David Nalesnik]

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:39 AM, David Nalesnik
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:34 AM, SoundsFromSound
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> David Nalesnik wrote
>>> Haven't examined the other alternatives proposed, but here's something
>>> I just did.  It's based on a rewrite of functions in
>>> lily/accidental.cc
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> David
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lilypond-user mailing list
>>
>>> lilypond-user@
>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>>
>>>
>>> accidental-brackets.ly (3K)
>>> &lt;http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/197640/0/accidental-brackets.ly&gt;
>>
>> Wow. David, this looks amazing. Perfect and exactly what the doctor ordered
>> - well, for what I need :) Hope it helps others too! Huge thanks for this.
>> Works like a charm.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> On a side note, I'm becoming more and more convinced that C++ stencil
> stuff should be ported to Scheme.  It makes user modification so much
> easier.
>

Though, on a technical note, I'm unsure of the best way to handle the
pattern of repeatedly modifying a variable's value which the C++
source does in stencil functions.  I've tried to avoid use of set! --
instead declaring new variables in the course of a let* block.  But
maybe set! isn't so un-schemic and is better for eliminating levels of
nesting?

David