[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better slashed graces
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: Better slashed graces |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:51:54 -0600 |
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gilberto Agostinho
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> David Nalesnik wrote
>>> I think the function needs
>>> something like "if there is a beam, then add a slash, else if no beam
>>> then
>>> no slash". Do you think you could give me a hand with that?
>>
>> Sure, that's no problem. And it looks a bit cleaner than what I went
>> in the last reply
>
> Fantastic, thanks a lot for the help!!
>
> I made one small improvement to the functions, now the slashes the same
> thickness as in the default single note \slashedGrace, and it looks better
> now. For anyone interested, here is the link for the function:
> acciaccaturas_and_slashed_notes.ly
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n198198/acciaccaturas_and_slashed_notes.ly>
>
Looks great!
-David
Re: Better slashed graces, Andrew Bernard, 2016/12/19