Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

[David Kastrup]

Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 04.02.2017 um 22:16 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Separating website content from general documentation should definitely
>>> be an option.
>> What advantages do you expect from it?
>
> Breaking the technical tie between documentation and website makes it
> possible to update the (much smaller) website independently from the
> documentation system.

So what updates are expected to be done by who in consequence of such a
change?

> Basically I have the impression that we will never change the basic
> documentation system anymore because it's such a complex and
> historically grown system. And everytime someone comes to us proposing
> more-than-cosmetic changes they are eventually rejected because they
> are not compatible with that inflexible system.

So which more-than-cosmetic changes are we anticipating in consequence
of a change to the website generation?

-- 
David Kastrup