[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock
From: |
mskala |
Subject: |
Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:57:59 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LNX 67 2015-01-07) |
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> It would be even better, I think, if Lily noticed the circular dependency and
> aborted with an informative message instead of just running on forever.
This may be a problem if there's any possibility of an include being
conditional. Then, someone could write a non-infinite recursive include
deliberately, and be disappointed when Lilypond breaks it.
--
Matthew Skala
address@hidden People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
- Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Michael Käppler, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, mskala, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Simon Albrecht, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock,
mskala <=
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Johan Vromans, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, caagr98, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, mskala, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Simon Albrecht, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Michael Käppler, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, mskala, 2017/06/21
Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Michael Käppler, 2017/06/21