[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: removing automatically generated natural signs
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: removing automatically generated natural signs |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:10:54 -0500 |
Urs,
> But to be fair one should note that there are serious encoding systems out
> there that work like the OP expects, for example the MEI encoding format or
> the Amadeus notation software.
> When I discussed the topic with an Amadeus power user he said that he would
> go nuts with all the typing (of the extra is and es) with the thousands of
> pages of music he has to create every year.
> MEI on the other hand wants to encode "what is on the paper", that is: an "a"
> for any pitch on that step. However, I don't accept that because that a flat
> in e flat major is *not* printed as an "a" that becomes an a flat through the
> key signature. Actually it's a note head in the second space that becomes an
> a through the treble clef and only then an a flat.
There is no reason one can't code some syntactic sugar to make it work “as
expected” (i.e., without "all the 'extra' typing") in Lilypond as well.
I just don't think it's a great idea. =)
Cheers,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
Re: removing automatically generated natural signs, Chris Jones, 2017/12/08
Re: removing automatically generated natural signs, David Wright, 2017/12/10
Re: removing automatically generated natural signs, Chris Jones, 2017/12/11
Re: removing automatically generated natural signs, David Wright, 2017/12/08