Re: Triple slurring

[Simon Albrecht]

 

Am 11-Dec-2017 14:56:40 +0100 schrieb address@hidden:

>  Am 11.12.2017 um 10:08 schrieb David Kastrup:
>  > David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>  >
>  >> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>  >>
>  >>> I'm encountering triple slurs like in the attached
>  >>> examples. Discussion came to the conclusion that I should not
>  >>> "modernize" the notation using only one slur but regard it as an
>  >>> expressive means.
>  >>> Any ideas?
>  >>> (And particularly ideas that also work with LilyPond 2.18?)
>  >> spanner-id (only as string) was introduced in version 2.15.5. The
>  >> convenient way of setting it via \= is a 2.19 thing, but you can do the
>  >> same with a function of your own or manually.
>  > Oh um, that will give you three slurs. They will still be attached to
>  > the whole chord, so not overly useful. You'll either need extensive
>  > slur coordinate manipulation,
>
>  That means using my "fake polyphony" together with \shape, isn't it?
>  Probably it's the best I should do in the current case.
>
>  > or you'll have to rely on 2.19 for
>  > in-chord slurs (which can be attached to single notes) after all.
>  >
>
>  Could you give me an example? I'm not sure I see what you mean.

 

\version "2.19"

 

{

  <c\= 1 ( e\= 2 ( g\= 3 ( >4

  <b\= 1 ) d\= 2 ) as\= 3 ) >

}

 

in conjunction with shape...

 

Best Simon