[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fisisis impossible?

From: Ben
Subject: Re: fisisis impossible?
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 15:33:43 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0

On 3/10/2018 3:20 PM, bart deruyter wrote:
Hi all,

got in a situation, trying to describe the bis augmented chord in second inversion, which would contain fisisis in a slashed chord name.

Lilypond returns an error, unexpected symbol, expecting tonicname pitch, which makes me believe that lilypond does not know triple sharps (isisis). 

Am I right? Are there solutions for this? 

using version 2.19.65 here.

I'm making a list of guitar chord diagrams of triads, and their inversions for my students. Using an enharmonic equivalent would fail in showing the logic behind the structure of chords, so that wouldn't work for me.


Triple sharps? For a classroom chord chart? Just curious, but why?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]