[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: that migrating "opus"
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: that migrating "opus" |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:40:01 -0700 |
David,
Again, thank you for your direction/advice.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: David Wright [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 6:05 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: that migrating "opus"
On Sun 11 Mar 2018 at 12:40:35 (-0700), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> David,
>
> Your continued effort to address my inquiry is uncommon. Many more
> esoteric and arcane matters appear on the list with multiple, and
> often contentious, responses. Yet you are the only one to respond to
> this simple inquiry and then it is not posted on the list.
The convention on this list appears to be
to: a person
cc: the list
so that's what I do. My response is on the list, but some mail systems do
various things like:
. deliver only one copy of messages (which could explain your case,
where you received just the personal copy), . refuse to deliver messages
they recognise as coming from the sender
(which can lead people to keep reposting a message to a list
because they think it never arrives).
> Thank you for your kind attention.
>
> Your courtesy (your snippet is in my repository!) restricts any
> further comment. Suffice it to say that I have found a simple
> alternative: put the opus number in the "arranger" field.
Fair enough. There are two things to watch out for:
. the headings are left/right paired, so you can get gaps below them.
(I use this as a positive feature with Anglican chants, using opus
for the composer and meter for any necessary annotation, thereby
ensuring that the composer is close-set and a lengthy annotation
will not collide with it.)
. There are LP headers that find their way into the PDF metadata, and
they might end up mislabelled there. Not a worry for most people,
and there are probably ways to edit such metadata anyway.
Cheers,
David.
- Re: that migrating "opus", (continued)
- Re: that migrating "opus", Ben, 2018/03/08
- Re: that migrating "opus", David Wright, 2018/03/09
- RE: that migrating "opus", Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2018/03/09
- Re: that migrating "opus", David Wright, 2018/03/09
- RE: that migrating "opus", Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2018/03/10
- Re: that migrating "opus", David Wright, 2018/03/10
- RE: that migrating "opus", Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2018/03/11
- Re: that migrating "opus", David Wright, 2018/03/11
- RE: that migrating "opus",
Mark Stephen Mrotek <=