[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

From: Torsten Hämmerle
Subject: Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 09:47:39 -0700 (MST)

Urs Liska-3 wrote
> I can't comment on the implementation, but IMHO it looks fine.

Thanks, that's all I wanted to know here on the user list.
The actual implementation isn't perfectly complete anyway (and I'll have to
do a lot of testing because note names and accidentals are terribly basic

Abraham has just sent a reply regarding the glyph double-flat (and,
consequently, new triple-flat) appearance, it starts getting interesting...

Urs Liska-3 wrote
> Why is that so? From the actual height on the page there shouldn't be an 
> issue having it below the dot. Is there a padding or an Y-extent that 
> disturbes?

Just about 3 seconds after pressing the "Post Message" button I asked myself
the same question.
Optically, it shouldn't be a problem to shove the #x under the dot, the
vertical dimensions are according to the # standard, hmmm... 
I'll have a closer look at this (probably tomorrow, at the moment I've just
messed up something and can't compile the documentation anymore...).

All the best,

Sent from:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]