Re:Advice on naming and structuring scholarLY command

[Flaming Hakama by Elaine]

Actually I think  \edmark and \edMarkup (or something along these lines) might be the best compromise between the generality of the command, expressiveness and practicality.

Urs

My $0.02 is that you should spell out \editorialMark.

\edMark is not expressive enough.

We're not in an 8.3 epoch, there is no cost to a few extra letters to say what you really mean. 

Thanks,

Elaine Alt

415 . 341 .4954                                           "Confusion is highly underrated"

address@hidden

Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-