Re: \consists terminology

[David Kastrup]

Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:

> How about \contains and \excludes?
>
> \contains says that we want a context to contain a particular kind of 
> translator
> \excludes says that we want  exclude  a translator that would normally be 
> included
>
> \includes and \excludes would be more a natural pair, but then there
> is a conflict between \include and \includes
>
> Another alternative might be \including and \excluding

Or \engages / \disengages .  So many bike sheds.

-- 
David Kastrup