Re: Avoiding the message about too many colliding rests

[Urs Liska]

Am 11. November 2018 22:14:31 MEZ schrieb Noeck <address@hidden>:
>Am 11.11.18 um 12:13 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> A very quick glance offered only one snippet where stemUp/Down is
>reasonable: Stem and Slur in different directions.
>
>
>I think \stemUp/Down has its place as a fine tuning not a replacement
>for voices.
>
>Here is a snippet where I actually think it is a reasonable choice to
>use \stemUp and \stemDown:
>
>\version "2.19.80"
>
>\relative {
>  \key c \minor
>  \voiceOne
>  \stemDown c'16\p^( es fis g \stemUp as\< g fis g \!
>  es'\> d c g\! as[ g] \stemDown fis g) |
>}
>
>(First voice and first measure of Rachmaninoff, op. 23 No. 7.)
>
>It's piano music and I already use 6 voices to represent the
>"voice"-structure of the music. But sometimes the notes of one voice
>are
>played by the other hand and that is indicated by the stem direction.
>All other directions are kept (slurs, etc.).
>

That's the direction I wanted to comment on too. However it is of course 
possible to do that with a simple override, and \stemUp has the potential to 
confuse users who think it is sufficient where they'd actually need a \voiceX 
command.

Urs


>Cheers,
>Joram
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user