---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>
To: Lilypond-User Mailing List <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 16:55:36 -0500
Subject: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?]Hi all,On my setup (Mac OS X, Lilypond 2.19.80), the code\version "2.18.2"
\fixed c'' { e4*4/5( d c)( d e) }gives1. Is the crossing of the ties a bug?2. Regardless, is there a way I can make all ties to begin a little bit further to the right and end a little further to the left of the centre of each notehead, so there is a gap between consecutive ties?Thanks,Kieren.
\version "2.19.80"
% I have to admit, I don't understand what this means musically.
% Seems like either this should be 2 slurs, not elided, or a single slur over all 5 notes.
\score {
\new Staff <<
\fixed c'' { e4*4/5( d c ) ( d e ) }
>>
\layout { }
}
% Working with the confusing example as-is,
% I'm not sure how to do this globally, but the normal \shape command can be made to work.
slurTweak = { \shape #'((0.3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (-0.3 . 0)) Slur }
\score {
\new Staff <<
\fixed c'' {
% The trick seems to be to add the second tweak before the first slur ends
\slurTweak e4*4/5( d \slurTweak c ) ( d e )
}
>>
\layout {
}
}
% I have to admit, I don't understand what this means musically.
% Seems like either this should be 2 slurs, not elided, or a single slur over all 5 notes.
\score {
\new Staff <<
\fixed c'' { e4*4/5( d c ) ( d e ) }
>>
\layout { }
}
% Working with the confusing example as-is,
% I'm not sure how to do this globally, but the normal \shape command can be made to work.
slurTweak = { \shape #'((0.3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (-0.3 . 0)) Slur }
\score {
\new Staff <<
\fixed c'' {
% The trick seems to be to add the second tweak before the first slur ends
\slurTweak e4*4/5( d \slurTweak c ) ( d e )
}
>>
\layout {
}
}
HTH,
Elaine Alt
415 . 341 .4954 "Confusion is highly underrated"
address@hidden-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-