[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines |
Date: |
Tue, 21 May 2019 10:49:01 +0200 |
Am Di., 21. Mai 2019 um 02:32 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
<address@hidden>:
>
> Am So., 19. Mai 2019 um 20:32 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska <address@hidden>:
>
> > The staves that continue to be printed appear to only happen when the
> > last note in that staff is an actual printed note. If it's a rest or a
> > space then the extra staves are not printed. Further experimentation
> > and it looks like the extra staves are only printed if the final note
> > is less than a quarter note (!).
> [..]
> > Maybe something to do with the time signature as well?
> >
> > This looks like a bug maybe?
> >
> > I could confirm that behaviour with the following MWE:
> >
> > \version "2.21.0"
> >
> > \score {
> > <<
> > \new Staff { c'1 c'1 }
> > \new Staff { c'1 c'4 c'16 }
> > \new Staff { c'1 c'8 }
> > \new Staff { c'1 c'4 }
> > \new Staff { c'1 c'4. }
> > >>
> > }
> >
> > I too find this surprising. I suggest you ask on lilypond-user whether this
> > is a bug or intended behaviour. If it is intended (due to some engraving
> > convention for example) it might be made configurable.
>
> Looks like a bug to me.
>
> First bad commit:
>
> commit 9ff88d127acb371435a96e04cba7f0e3f525496d
> Author: Keith OHara <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat Aug 6 12:05:59 2011 -0700
>
> auto-beam-engraver: keep a Context_handle to starting Staff
>
> Which is in version 2.15.9
>
> cc-ing Keith
>
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
At least in the minimal one can workaround with inserting \noBeam:
\score {
<<
\new Staff { c'1 c'1 }
\new Staff { c'1 c'4 c'16 \noBeam }
\new Staff { c'1 c'8 \noBeam }
\new Staff { c'1 c'4 }
\new Staff { c'1 c'4. }
>>
}
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, (continued)
RE: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2019/05/19
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, David Bellows, 2019/05/19
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Aaron Hill, 2019/05/19
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, David Bellows, 2019/05/19
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Urs Liska, 2019/05/19
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, David Bellows, 2019/05/19
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Urs Liska, 2019/05/19
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Thomas Morley, 2019/05/20
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Urs Liska, 2019/05/21
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Thomas Morley, 2019/05/21
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, David Bellows, 2019/05/21
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Thomas Morley, 2019/05/21
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, David Bellows, 2019/05/21
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Leo Correia de Verdier, 2019/05/21
- Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Thomas Morley, 2019/05/21
RE: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2019/05/19
Re: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, David Bellows, 2019/05/19
RE: Unconventional score and unwanted stray staff lines, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2019/05/19