lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug in lyric syllable magnetic snap


From: Alexander Kobel
Subject: Re: bug in lyric syllable magnetic snap
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 08:17:15 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

Hi Harm, hi all,

On 22.05.19 01:20, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Do., 16. Mai 2019 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Alexander Kobel <address@hidden>:

Hi David, hi Mike, hi all,

I sometimes (still use Lilypond, and when I do, I typically use) your
wonderful snippet for snapping "close" syllables into a single token. [...]

Now I stumbled across an issue with that: two syllables are combined
which are clearly far apart; see the attached screenshot and reduced
working example from an actual engraving. It's not exactly minimal, but
at least it's reasonably short and shows the problem. And the exact
circumstances when the bug occurs are not clear to me, and it's somewhat
sensitive to reduction.

According to my tests, it's related to the facts that there is

(1) a hyphen *before* the syllable "bor" in "ver -- bor -- gen" in the
alto part;

(2) a line break exactly there (moving the break "remedies" the
problem); and

(3) another voice/staff simultaneously (commenting out the soprano
mitigates the issue as well).

It's not, however, related to the accidental in the soprano, or the fact
that the whole note in the lower voice is wider than the quarter in the
upper voice (replacing d'1 by d'4*4 doesn't help).


Any thoughts on what goes wrong here, and about a possible fix or
workarounds?

d'oh; I must have been tired as well. Obvious workaround: revert LyricWord.after-line-breaking (or override to ##f) at the problematic places. Of course, it's a manual workaround; but an automatic workaround would be a fix, right?

Hi,

I tried to have a look at it ...

Though, I'm too tired to be verbose, please refer to the pdf.
First a minimal, then some debugging output with a probably
significant difference. [...]

Thank you, that's what I should have done immediately when posting; sorry about that.

You forgot to attach the PDF, but I have an idea about what you did and observed, and what significant difference you point to; I'll try to investigate further as soon as possible.


Thanks again,
Alex

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]