lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues


From: Aaron Hill
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 04:38:24 -0800
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8

On 2019-12-13 3:54 am, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter <address@hidden> writes:
A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ?
significant?

It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font layout
of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but nevertheless this seems
strange.

pango-font.cc emits the warning with %0X, so that U+ number is in hex.

U+0092 (Private Use Two) is a control character from Latin-1 Supplement. But I would suspect this was meant to be character 0x92 from a non-Unicode code page, possibly Windows code page 1252 which equates to U+2019 (0x92): Right Single Quotation Mark.


-- Aaron Hill



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]