[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!
From: |
mason |
Subject: |
Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Dec 2019 16:01:40 -0800 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716-346-437793-dirty |
On 12/28, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> I happen to have a little problem with that as well; here on my Ubuntu
> 16.04 machine neither apt nor synaptic can find any variation of
> qtwebengine5. There are several variations of webkit or so, but that’s
> probably something different, right? What can I do?
The first version of Ubuntu to package qtwebengine was 18.04 Bionic.[1]
Is upgrading an option for you, or do you need to stick with 16.04?
Mason
[1]
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=qtwebengine&searchon=sourcenames
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Wilbert Berendsen, 2019/12/27
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Ralph Palmer, 2019/12/27
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Kevin Cole, 2019/12/27
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Kevin Cole, 2019/12/27
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Simon Albrecht, 2019/12/27
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!,
mason <=
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Urs Liska, 2019/12/28
- Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04, Simon Albrecht, 2019/12/28
- Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04, Urs Liska, 2019/12/28
- Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04, mason, 2019/12/28
- Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04, Simon Albrecht, 2019/12/28
- Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04, mason, 2019/12/28
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Ralph Palmer, 2019/12/28
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Knute Snortum, 2019/12/28
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Knute Snortum, 2019/12/28
- Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!, Urs Liska, 2019/12/28