[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \include inside function
From: |
Valentin Petzel |
Subject: |
Re: \include inside function |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Feb 2022 21:08:30 +0100 |
> And it still breaks down because at the top level, LilyPond input does
> not reflect a static structure but directs actions, actions that have
> immediate consequences _while_ still reading ahead.
I do not understand why this matters here? Doesn’t this only matter while we
are parsing the file? I understand that delayed scheme calls to variables
defined in the subfile poses some challenge, but such things should be rather
uncommon.
Valentin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- \include inside function, Leo Correia de Verdier, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, David Kastrup, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, Valentin Petzel, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, David Kastrup, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, Valentin Petzel, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, David Kastrup, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, Valentin Petzel, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, David Kastrup, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, Valentin Petzel, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, David Kastrup, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function,
Valentin Petzel <=
- Re: \include inside function, David Kastrup, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, Valentin Petzel, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/01
- Re: \include inside function, Valentin Petzel, 2022/02/01
Re: \include inside function, David Wright, 2022/02/01
Re: \include inside function, Valentin Petzel, 2022/02/01