[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consecutive trills
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: Consecutive trills |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:48:46 +0200 |
> On 29 Apr 2022, at 16:31, Martín Rincón Botero <martinrinconbotero@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Hans!
>
> As far as I know that's not a notation rule, but I agree that it makes more
> sense to use the trill + wavy line for tied notes.
I haven't seen "tr" plus chevron on a single untied note, though the Harvard
Concise mentions that "t" plus chevron has been used historically, but then
perhaps not extending beyond the note itself.
- Consecutive trills, Martín Rincón Botero, 2022/04/29
- Re: Consecutive trills, Hans Åberg, 2022/04/29
- Re: Consecutive trills, Martín Rincón Botero, 2022/04/29
- Re: Consecutive trills,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: Consecutive trills, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/04/29
- Re: Consecutive trills, Hans Åberg, 2022/04/29
- RE: Consecutive trills, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2022/04/29
- Re: Consecutive trills, Kira Garvie, 2022/04/29
- Re: Consecutive trills, Hans Åberg, 2022/04/29
- Re: Consecutive trills, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2022/04/29
- Re: Consecutive trills, Hans Åberg, 2022/04/30
Re: Consecutive trills, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/04/29