[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: polychords: what's the current state-of-the-art?

From: Kieren MacMillan
Subject: Re: polychords: what's the current state-of-the-art?
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:03:16 -0400

Hi Valentin,

> Suppose we had a different way of specifying chords not as a bunch of notes, 
> but in a representation that preserves the theoretical meaning of such a 
> chord.

The GSoC work was working towards exactly that.

> This way we could have a transposable syntax to say e.g. des|c to specify Db 
> major over C major or even g|dis:m|cis:m or something and would be able to 
> quickly get the chord specification we actually want, instead of having to do 
> something like c:3.5.9-.11.13- or even something like this 
> cis,:m3.

We really need something like this.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]