lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strange behaviour of multiple \include’d documents


From: Immanuel Asmus
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of multiple \include’d documents
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 22:26:19 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1

Hello Jean,

actually, I did subscribe. I wonder why my subscription was unsuccessful. I just tried again.

I finally found the cause of this error: It seems I checked only the paper variables of my main document and Wetterlied.ly, whereas I didn’t llok carefully into the other tqo source files. Both of them had system-count set to something too small for Wetterlied.ly. Since I did not set a new system-count for the latter, the systems got crammed.

Regards,
Immanuel

Am 30.01.2023 um 17:33 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
Hello Immanuel,

Welcome to this list. For your information, I had to approve your message manually as a list administrator because you are not subscribed to the list yet. Please fix this by subscribing on https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user (note that once subscribed, you can opt out of receiving emails or choose to receive only one batch digest per day).



Le 30 janv. 2023 à 17:20, Immanuel Asmus <iasmus@freenet.de> a écrit :



Dear community,

I’ve been using lilypond for a fair amount of time, and even though I sometimes use non-standard notation, I’ve never had any problem finding a solution. Until now.

It’s my first time typesetting a song cycle I wrote. I want (as what I understand is recommended) to typeset every piece on its own, then include all of them via the \include command.

My main document looks like this:

\version "2.22.2"

\header {
  title = "Seltsame Liebeslieder"
  composer = "Frühjahr 2007 – Frühjahr 2021"
  tagline = ##f
}

\include "Trinklied.ly"
\include "Fruehlingslied.ly"
\include "Wetterlied.ly"

Now, including the first and second piece was no problem. When I add the third piece, however, I end up without any line break up from the middle of it (see attached “nobreak.png”).




When the music overflows like this, it almost certainly means that a duration is off somewhere, and the last note of each measure is actually straddling over the bar line, continuing into the next measure by a tiny amount. I would try to insert some bar checks (the “|” sign) at places where bar lines are supposed to be, to flag rhythm problems. If you get different results when you include your score after another score, it might mean that you started the problematic score without an explicit duration on the first note. In that case, the duration is that of the previous note, or “4” if there is no previous note. This is a possible cause, maybe you just need to add a “4” on the first note of the score that overflows.

Best,
Jean


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]