[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Linphone-developers] STUN per-setting on Android is buggy

From: German Cancio
Subject: Re: [Linphone-developers] STUN per-setting on Android is buggy
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:37:00 +0100

An additional finding:

The STUN server settings under Settings->Network get easily lost. Reproducible with the following steps:

1. go to settings->Network and set a STUN server, activate ICE
2. to to the account setting by tapping on the name of the account - without modifying anything.
3. go back to settings->Network, the STUN server and ICE settings have vanished!

many thanks and cheers, Germán

On 21 Jan 2020, at 14:25, German Cancio <address@hidden> wrote:

Dear Developers,

On Android, some parameters, including STUN/TURN and ICE, can be set in two places - in the general network configuration but also for each SIP account. Setting STUN at the account level does NOT work, even if I put it afterwards in the general network setting. What works well is setting these in the general network config and leaving the per-account settings untouched. (I had to delete my account on the phone and recreate it.) 

When setting a (correct) STUN value in the account settings, I see the following in the Android logs:

2020-01-21 14:19:45:474 [liblinphone] MESSAGE Created new ICE check list for stream [0]
2020-01-21 14:19:45:474 [mediastreamer] MESSAGE ms_filter_link: MSRtpRecv:0x6f2cbcf180,0-->MSVoidSink:0x6f2bf8cb00,0
2020-01-21 14:19:45:474 [liblinphone] WARNING ICE is used without STUN server
2020-01-21 14:19:45:475 [liblinphone] MESSAGE ICE: bypass candidates gathering
2020-01-21 14:19:45:475 [mediastreamer] MESSAGE ms_filter_unlink: MSRtpRecv:0x6f2cbcf180,0-->MSVoidSink:0x6f2bf8cb00,0

Which of course, is incorrect as I have configured a (correct) STUN server.

I can confirm this problem is still present in the current Google Play beta version. 

Any hints? Should I report this as a bug to gitlab?

Many thanks and best regards,


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]