lmi-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lmi-commits] [lmi] master 358ed8a 3/3: Resolve a marked defect [345]


From: Greg Chicares
Subject: [lmi-commits] [lmi] master 358ed8a 3/3: Resolve a marked defect [345]
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:11:17 -0400 (EDT)

branch: master
commit 358ed8aa251b35be142b20d3223aa90668b5acb4
Author: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
Commit: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>

    Resolve a marked defect [345]
    
    The mce_pmt_corridor strategy was designed for single-premium scenarios:
    it simply calculates initial premium as the specified amount divided by
    the corridor factor.
    
    Changed the old calculation:
      specified_amount[current year] / corridor_factor[first year]
    to
      specified_amount[first year] / corridor_factor[first year]
    because the old one had no plausible meaning.
    
    After the first year, this strategy seems unuseful, although it's not
    forbidden: someone may find a use for it someday, perhaps with some
    kind of modification.
---
 ihs_avstrtgy.cpp | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ihs_avstrtgy.cpp b/ihs_avstrtgy.cpp
index d93f350..e748777 100644
--- a/ihs_avstrtgy.cpp
+++ b/ihs_avstrtgy.cpp
@@ -294,8 +294,10 @@ double AccountValue::DoPerformPmtStrategy
             }
         case mce_pmt_corridor:
             {
-// TODO ?? Shouldn't this be initial specified amount?
-            double sa = ActualSpecAmt + (TermIsDbFor7702 ? TermSpecAmt : 0.0);
+            double sa =
+                                     InvariantValues().SpecAmt    [0]
+                + (TermIsDbFor7702 ? InvariantValues().TermSpecAmt[0] : 0.0)
+                ;
             return GetModalPremCorridor(0, a_InitialMode, sa);
             }
         case mce_pmt_table:



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]