lmi-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lmi-commits] [lmi] master 8738f07 5/7: Improve concinnity of database d


From: Greg Chicares
Subject: [lmi-commits] [lmi] master 8738f07 5/7: Improve concinnity of database descriptions
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:44:32 -0500 (EST)

branch: master
commit 8738f071e5ed8554460c9463b582185c0afeb9fd
Author: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
Commit: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>

    Improve concinnity of database descriptions
    
    Made four descriptions match
      Maximum specified amount to which .* can apply
    where previously only two did. This emphasizes that all four are limits
    on specified amount, which naturally are to be rounded in the same way
    as specified amount. Repeating the phrase "specified amount" in the
    DB_SpecAmtLoadLimit description isn't good poetic style, but technical
    style favors unambiguity, and omitting the second occurrence would make
    it more ambiguous.
---
 dbnames.xpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dbnames.xpp b/dbnames.xpp
index fec6d39..5bc3ec6 100644
--- a/dbnames.xpp
+++ b/dbnames.xpp
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
 {DB_CurrAcctValLoad,DB_Topic_Loads,"CurrAcctValLoad","Expense charge as 
proportion of separate account value",}, \
 {DB_TgtPremMonthlyPolFee,DB_Topic_Loads,"TgtPremMonthlyPolFee","Target-premium 
monthly policy fee",}, \
 {DB_LoadRfdProportion,DB_Topic_Loads,"LoadRfdProportion","Proportion of sales 
load refundable on full surrender",}, \
-{DB_SpecAmtLoadLimit,DB_Topic_Loads,"SpecAmtLoadLimit","Limit up to which 
charge per $1 of specified amount applies",}, \
+{DB_SpecAmtLoadLimit,DB_Topic_Loads,"SpecAmtLoadLimit","Maximum specified 
amount to which load per $1 of specified amount can apply",}, \
 {DB_DynamicSepAcctLoad,DB_Topic_Loads,"DynamicSepAcctLoad","Separate account 
AV load dynamically determined based on total case assets: 0=no, 1=yes",}, \
 {DB_DynSepAcctLoadLimit,DB_Topic_Loads,"DynSepAcctLoadLimit","Highest 
separate-account balance subject to dynamic AV load",}, \
 {DB_Topic_DacAndPremiumTax,DB_FIRST,"DAC and premium tax","DAC and premium tax 
parameters and charges",}, \
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@
 {DB_VarExpPrem,DB_Topic_Expenses,"VarExpPrem","Variable expense per $1 of 
premium [not yet implemented]",}, \
 {DB_VarExpDumpin,DB_Topic_Expenses,"VarExpDumpin","Variable expense per $1 of 
dumpin [not yet implemented]",}, \
 {DB_VarExpSpecAmt,DB_Topic_Expenses,"VarExpSpecAmt","Variable expense per $1 
of specified amount [not yet implemented]",}, \
-{DB_ExpSpecAmtLimit,DB_Topic_Expenses,"ExpSpecAmtLimit","Maximum specified 
amount to which expense per $1 of specified amount applies [not yet 
implemented]",}, \
+{DB_ExpSpecAmtLimit,DB_Topic_Expenses,"ExpSpecAmtLimit","Maximum specified 
amount to which expense per $1 of specified amount can apply [not yet 
implemented]",}, \
 {DB_MedicalProportion,DB_Topic_Expenses,"MedicalProportion","Proportion 
requiring medical or paramedical underwriting [not yet implemented]",}, \
 {DB_UwTestCost,DB_Topic_Expenses,"UwTestCost","Expense per policy issue for 
underwriting tests [not yet implemented]",}, \
 {DB_Topic_Reserves,DB_FIRST,"Reserves","Reserves [not yet implemented]",}, \



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]