[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lmi-commits] [lmi] master 8738f07 5/7: Improve concinnity of database d
From: |
Greg Chicares |
Subject: |
[lmi-commits] [lmi] master 8738f07 5/7: Improve concinnity of database descriptions |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:44:32 -0500 (EST) |
branch: master
commit 8738f071e5ed8554460c9463b582185c0afeb9fd
Author: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
Commit: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
Improve concinnity of database descriptions
Made four descriptions match
Maximum specified amount to which .* can apply
where previously only two did. This emphasizes that all four are limits
on specified amount, which naturally are to be rounded in the same way
as specified amount. Repeating the phrase "specified amount" in the
DB_SpecAmtLoadLimit description isn't good poetic style, but technical
style favors unambiguity, and omitting the second occurrence would make
it more ambiguous.
---
dbnames.xpp | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dbnames.xpp b/dbnames.xpp
index fec6d39..5bc3ec6 100644
--- a/dbnames.xpp
+++ b/dbnames.xpp
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
{DB_CurrAcctValLoad,DB_Topic_Loads,"CurrAcctValLoad","Expense charge as
proportion of separate account value",}, \
{DB_TgtPremMonthlyPolFee,DB_Topic_Loads,"TgtPremMonthlyPolFee","Target-premium
monthly policy fee",}, \
{DB_LoadRfdProportion,DB_Topic_Loads,"LoadRfdProportion","Proportion of sales
load refundable on full surrender",}, \
-{DB_SpecAmtLoadLimit,DB_Topic_Loads,"SpecAmtLoadLimit","Limit up to which
charge per $1 of specified amount applies",}, \
+{DB_SpecAmtLoadLimit,DB_Topic_Loads,"SpecAmtLoadLimit","Maximum specified
amount to which load per $1 of specified amount can apply",}, \
{DB_DynamicSepAcctLoad,DB_Topic_Loads,"DynamicSepAcctLoad","Separate account
AV load dynamically determined based on total case assets: 0=no, 1=yes",}, \
{DB_DynSepAcctLoadLimit,DB_Topic_Loads,"DynSepAcctLoadLimit","Highest
separate-account balance subject to dynamic AV load",}, \
{DB_Topic_DacAndPremiumTax,DB_FIRST,"DAC and premium tax","DAC and premium tax
parameters and charges",}, \
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@
{DB_VarExpPrem,DB_Topic_Expenses,"VarExpPrem","Variable expense per $1 of
premium [not yet implemented]",}, \
{DB_VarExpDumpin,DB_Topic_Expenses,"VarExpDumpin","Variable expense per $1 of
dumpin [not yet implemented]",}, \
{DB_VarExpSpecAmt,DB_Topic_Expenses,"VarExpSpecAmt","Variable expense per $1
of specified amount [not yet implemented]",}, \
-{DB_ExpSpecAmtLimit,DB_Topic_Expenses,"ExpSpecAmtLimit","Maximum specified
amount to which expense per $1 of specified amount applies [not yet
implemented]",}, \
+{DB_ExpSpecAmtLimit,DB_Topic_Expenses,"ExpSpecAmtLimit","Maximum specified
amount to which expense per $1 of specified amount can apply [not yet
implemented]",}, \
{DB_MedicalProportion,DB_Topic_Expenses,"MedicalProportion","Proportion
requiring medical or paramedical underwriting [not yet implemented]",}, \
{DB_UwTestCost,DB_Topic_Expenses,"UwTestCost","Expense per policy issue for
underwriting tests [not yet implemented]",}, \
{DB_Topic_Reserves,DB_FIRST,"Reserves","Reserves [not yet implemented]",}, \
- [lmi-commits] [lmi] master updated (53a8634 -> 62c89fd), Greg Chicares, 2021/02/04
- [lmi-commits] [lmi] master 8738f07 5/7: Improve concinnity of database descriptions,
Greg Chicares <=
- [lmi-commits] [lmi] master a8e24b0 6/7: Rectify a strange test for infinity, Greg Chicares, 2021/02/04
- [lmi-commits] [lmi] master 62c89fd 7/7: Use currency type for some potentially-infinite limits, Greg Chicares, 2021/02/04
- [lmi-commits] [lmi] master 2cf0e24 1/7: Overload query_into() for currency, Greg Chicares, 2021/02/04
- [lmi-commits] [lmi] master 0d94134 2/7: Note a possible improvement, Greg Chicares, 2021/02/04
- [lmi-commits] [lmi] master dcc33f1 3/7: Replace a free function with a better general implementation, Greg Chicares, 2021/02/04
- [lmi-commits] [lmi] master 48aa040 4/7: Use recently added query_into() overload for currency, Greg Chicares, 2021/02/04