Re[2]: [lmi] Re: "consistent style for calling this->operator[]()" change

[Vadim Zeitlin]

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:32:24 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:

GC> >  So it seems like Evgeniy's version is more common than the alternative
GC> > one, although by lesser margin than I thought. But note that projects such
GC> > as gcc libstdc++ and STLport do use (*this)[] and I think they're worth of
GC> > emulation.
GC> 
GC> I thought they wrote 'this' explicitly everywhere because of:
GC>   http://www.comeaucomputing.com/techtalk/templates/#whythisarrow

 This is only relevant in the template code and this isn't the case here.

GC> I don't mind changing to Evgeniy's version, in principle.
GC> I just want to introduce no unnecessary differences between
GC> branch and trunk before merging them. After the merge--that
GC> is, a month or so from now--I'd accept a set of changes that
GC> result in a consistent '(*this)[XXX]' style across the whole
GC> project.

 This makes perfect sense, thanks,
VZ