[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[3]: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status]
From: |
Vadim Zeitlin |
Subject: |
Re[3]: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status] |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:46:15 +0200 |
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:23:37 +0200 I wrote:
VZ> Rereading tailor man page now I think I should have used its --use-propset
VZ> option (although I still don't know what does "This requires some tweaks on
VZ> the SVN repository to enable revision propchanges." warning mean, Vaclav do
VZ> you know anything about this by chance?), let me know if you'd like me to
VZ> retry with it, i.e. if the above is unacceptable.
I've just looked at tailor documentation/sources more carefully and in
fact using this option is very simple and seems to be exactly what we need
so I did restart the process with it as it results in much more reasonable
history, e.g. right now (at the very beginning of the conversion) I have:
% svn log file:///var/svn/lmi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r3 | chicares | 2004-05-25 17:47:40 +0200 (Tue, 25 May 2004) | 1 line
Moved wx skeleton up one subdirectory: binary files flagged
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r2 | chicares | 2004-05-15 22:00:55 +0200 (Sat, 15 May 2004) | 1 line
Initial revision
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r1 | zeitlin | 2009-06-03 13:42:08 +0200 (Wed, 03 Jun 2009) | 1 line
This directory will host the upstream sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
so the only problem is the artificial first revision but hopefully it's not
a big problem (as I don't know how to get rid of it).
So I deleted the old dump file and will update it with the new version,
with the correct history as soon as the import finishes (in about 2 hours).
Sorry for the mistake with the first attempt,
VZ
- [lmi] Savannah status, Greg Chicares, 2009/06/01
- Re: [lmi] Savannah status, Vadim Zeitlin, 2009/06/01
- [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Greg Chicares, 2009/06/01
- Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Vadim Zeitlin, 2009/06/01
- Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Greg Chicares, 2009/06/01
- Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Vaclav Slavik, 2009/06/02
- Re[2]: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Vadim Zeitlin, 2009/06/02
- Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Greg Chicares, 2009/06/02
- Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Greg Chicares, 2009/06/02
- Re[2]: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Vadim Zeitlin, 2009/06/03
- Re[3]: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status],
Vadim Zeitlin <=
- Re[3]: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Vadim Zeitlin, 2009/06/03
- Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Greg Chicares, 2009/06/08
- Re[2]: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Vadim Zeitlin, 2009/06/08
- Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Greg Chicares, 2009/06/12
- [lmi] Maintaining our ftp area [Was: Converting...to svn?], Greg Chicares, 2009/06/13
- Re: [lmi] Converting...to svn? [Was: Savannah status], Greg Chicares, 2009/06/04
Re: [lmi] Savannah status, Greg Chicares, 2009/06/02