[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects

From: Vaclav Slavik
Subject: Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:40:43 +0100

On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 14:45 +0000, Greg Chicares wrote:
> advantages of xml, along with the disadvantage that its accompanying
> schema is incompatible with free software due to licensing. It would
> be better for us to use that xml format (without using the schema) 

Just to be clear: do I understand it correctly that you want to use the
XTbML format and not some home-grown format of our own? If that's the
case, I'm unclear on the "without using the schema" part: does it mean
not using its namespace? Or not including a copy? Or not consulting the
spec/schema at all and reverse-engineering it from existing documents?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]