[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects
From: |
Vaclav Slavik |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:40:43 +0100 |
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 14:45 +0000, Greg Chicares wrote:
> advantages of xml, along with the disadvantage that its accompanying
> schema is incompatible with free software due to licensing. It would
> be better for us to use that xml format (without using the schema)
Just to be clear: do I understand it correctly that you want to use the
XTbML format and not some home-grown format of our own? If that's the
case, I'm unclear on the "without using the schema" part: does it mean
not using its namespace? Or not including a copy? Or not consulting the
spec/schema at all and reverse-engineering it from existing documents?
Thanks,
Vaclav
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/15
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/03/16
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/16
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects,
Vaclav Slavik <=
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/16
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/03/17
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/17
- [lmi] Re[2]: XML formats (was: Terse list of valuable projects), Vadim Zeitlin, 2010/03/18
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/03/18
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/18
- Re[2]: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vadim Zeitlin, 2010/03/18
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/18
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/03/16
Re[2]: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vadim Zeitlin, 2010/03/16