[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects
From: |
Vaclav Slavik |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:31:33 +0100 |
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 01:39 +0000, Greg Chicares wrote:
> What I'm wondering is why no one seems to serialize this way instead:
>
> <item key="propC">
> <data>3 4 5</data>
> </item>
It's bad practice, you loose all the advantages of using XML compared to
some other, more human-readable text formats. Having just a generic XML
parser is no longer enough, the <data> field now requires interpretation
and a tokenizer to parse it. You cannot manipulate the content as a DOM
tree anymore. You cannot describe the data with schema languages and you
cannot validate it. You cannot transform it with XSLT or point to (part
of) the data with XPath. And you cannot display the data nicely with CSS
or FO, either.
Regards,
Vaclav
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/15
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/03/16
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/16
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/03/16
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/16
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/03/17
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/17
- [lmi] Re[2]: XML formats (was: Terse list of valuable projects), Vadim Zeitlin, 2010/03/18
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects,
Vaclav Slavik <=
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/18
- Re[2]: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vadim Zeitlin, 2010/03/18
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Greg Chicares, 2010/03/18
- Re: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/03/16
Re[2]: [lmi] Terse list of valuable projects, Vadim Zeitlin, 2010/03/16