[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lmi] wx-2.9.2: should '--disable-threads' force '--disable-fswatche

From: Vadim Zeitlin
Subject: Re: [lmi] wx-2.9.2: should '--disable-threads' force '--disable-fswatcher'?
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:20:32 +0200

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:17:28 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:

GC> While building this tarball:
GC>   ftp://ftp.wxwidgets.org/pub/Daily_HEAD/files/wx-all-2010-11-06.tar.gz
GC> ../configure --prefix=/opt/lmi/local --build=i686-pc-cygwin 
--host=i686-pc-mingw32 \
GC> [...] --disable-threads [...] && make && make install
GC> [...]
GC> In file included from ../include/wx/chkconf.h:1138,
GC>                  from ../include/wx/platform.h:711,
GC>                  from ../include/wx/defs.h:26,
GC>                  from ../include/wx/vector.h:15,
GC>                  from ../src/stc/scintilla/src/Selection.h:134,
GC>                  from ../src/stc/scintilla/src/Editor.cxx:41:
GC> ../include/wx/msw/chkconf.h:408:13: #error "wxFileSystemWatcher requires 
wxThread under MSW"
GC> If I add '--disable-fswatcher', then that problem does not occur.
GC> Should '--disable-threads' force '--disable-fswatcher'?

 In general we can't support all possible wxUSE_XXX dependencies as there
are simply too many of them but in this particular case it seems simple
enough to add a check for this to configure and it's also potentially
useful as it is probably not obvious that disabling threads also disables

 So I've just done it in r67965, thanks,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]