[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lmi] Safe to assume std::uint64_t is available?

From: Vadim Zeitlin
Subject: Re: [lmi] Safe to assume std::uint64_t is available?
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:17:16 +0200

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:09:35 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:

GC> Vadim--Does the patch below seem good to you? (Here, apparently the
GC> borland workaround was preferable to the code we were using for gcc.)

 Yes, we can rely on uint64_t being available on all supported platforms in

GC> I hesitate only because the exact-width integer types are optional
GC> [18.4.1]. This section of the code is for msw only; would any C++11
GC> (or more modern) compiler targeting msw really fail to provide uint64_t?

 Not IME and we already use uint64_t in rate_table.cpp, apparently without
any problems.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]