lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-devel] Announce: WireGuard implementation for lwIP


From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [lwip-devel] Announce: WireGuard implementation for lwIP
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:51:07 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1

Am 19.01.2021 um 12:44 schrieb Daniel Hope:
> Hello,
>
> I have developed a WireGuard implementation for an embedded project we
> are working on that uses lwIP. The implementation has been released as
> open source here: https://github.com/smartalock/wireguard-lwip
> <https://github.com/smartalock/wireguard-lwip
>
> WireGuard is a secure yet lightweight modern VPN protocol that has
> gained a lot of traction since being included in mainline Linux kernels.
> We use it to secure connections from embedded hardware back to cloud
> services as it has significantly less overhead than running TLS.
>
> The project contains a pure C, malloc free implementation of the
> WireGuard protocol, some glue in the form of a netif implementation and
> some crypto elements that end users may want to optimise for their platform.

Reading the readme on github, I'm not sure copying all those crypto
functions is a good idea. Including a more broadly used library that
provides them and is updated when problems arise might be better  -
although I'm not sure which library targeted at embedded systems might
provide everything you need.

>
> I hope this post isn’t considered spam - I think there may be embedded
> developers out there who will find this implementation useful!

Of course it's no considered spam. But unless you aim for integration
into the lwIP code base (which is rather unlikely, I think), you should
be writing this mail to the lwip-users list, not the lwip-devel list
(which is about the lwIP source code and problems with it).

Regards,
Simon



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]