[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc
From: |
Ivarsson Magnus |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:06:48 -0000 |
If I got you right your script is converting plain ascii files to html?
Are we not missing the connection to the source code then?
I mean extracting comments from the source code?
/Magnus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Sheer [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: den 20 augusti 2002 12:15
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: RE:[lwip] Suggestion: javadoc
>
>
>
> This is probably going to make people reel, but...
>
> I invented my own documentation format: a simple
> awk script that converts plain ascii into nice
> HTML. This allows documentation in the two
> most popular formats to be supported: text
> and HTML. I have really found that its simplicity
> overrides any advantages gained by sgml, roff, etc.
> It has the advantage that:
>
> - awk is supported on every Unix platform, nothing
> need be installed to compile documentation.
>
> - docs can be read without compiling.
>
> - web docs will always be in sync with ascii docs.
> because they recompile instantly with each build.
>
> The script is attached.
>
> A sample document is:
>
>
> LwIP: Light Weight IP Stack
> =====================
>
> The double line creates a major header. Here is an
> example of an indented list:
>
> 1. This paragraph will be indented.
>
> 2. So will this one.
>
> Or perhaps like:
>
> - This "bulletted" item will be indented when
> rendered in HTML
>
> URLs will be turned into hyperlinks for example
> http://this.com/ will become a hyperlink in HTML.
>
> Images will be creates as image links. For example
> (See someimg.jpg.)
>
> You get the idea
>
> -paul
>
>
>
> Powered by World Online - http://www.worldonline.co.za
>
>
> ------------- Original Message --------------
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Cc:
> Date: Tue,08/20/2002 09:32:38
> Subject: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc
>
> Hello,
>
> now that work is underway to have a CVS lwIP tree, I would
> suggest to standardize on a (self)documentation format.
>
> Proposal is JavaDoc format.
>
> Arguments have been given earlier (search the mailing list
> on "javadoc" and "doxygen") and I recall there was much
> agreement on this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Leon Woestenberg
>
> Axon Digital Design
> Phone: +31 13 511 6666
> Fax: +31 13 511 4151
> web: www.axon.tv
>
> ==============================================================
> ==================
>
> =====================
> The information contained in this communication is confidential and is
> intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
> addressed.
> Axon
> Digital Design Group is neither liable for the proper nor for
> the complete
> transmission of the information contained in this
> communication nor for any
>
> delay in its receipt. Axon Digital Design Group does not
> guarantee that the
>
> integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the
> communication
> is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. If you are not the
> intended
> recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified that reading,
> disseminating, distributing or copying this message is
> strictly prohibited.
> In
> that case please return the communication to the sender and delete and
> destroy
> all copies. In carrying out its engagements, Axon Digital Design Group
> applies
> general terms and conditions, which contain a clause that limits its
> liability.
> A copy of these terms and conditions is available on request free of
> charge.
> ==============================================================
> ==================
>
> =====================
>
> [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
>
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, Paul Sheer, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc,
Ivarsson Magnus <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, John C. Toman, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, John C. Toman, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, John C. Toman, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, Paul Sheer, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] Suggestion: javadoc, Ivarsson Magnus, 2003/01/09