[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: RE:[lwip] Suggestion: javadoc
From: |
Kenneth Porter |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: RE:[lwip] Suggestion: javadoc |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:11:38 -0000 |
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 03:15, Paul Sheer wrote:
> - awk is supported on every Unix platform, nothing
> need be installed to compile documentation.
What do you need to install for Javadoc?
> - docs can be read without compiling.
What does javadoc source look like? Is it unreadable?
> - web docs will always be in sync with ascii docs.
> because they recompile instantly with each build.
Build both from a common markup language, and they're still instantly
accessible after compiling.
> A sample document is:
> The double line creates a major header. Here is an
> example of an indented list:
>
> 1. This paragraph will be indented.
>
> 2. So will this one.
Hard to maintain for a long list, when you need to insert a new item at
the the beginning of the list.
> URLs will be turned into hyperlinks for example
> http://this.com/ will become a hyperlink in HTML.
How would escapes work? If you don't want a hyperlink? If text looks
like a hyperlink but isn't?
> Images will be creates as image links. For example
> (See someimg.jpg.)
Similar problem.
A big advantage of an existing format is that lots of tools exist to
manipulate it. No need to re-invent wheels. It's not like the build
tools have to run on our tiny targets.
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: RE:[lwip] Suggestion: javadoc,
Kenneth Porter <=